June 2, 2017

Overview

Talk will cover:

  • Motivation and Research Question
  • Data
  • Empirical Strategy
  • Results
  • Economic Relevance

Motivation and Research Question

Growing Risks of Natural Disasters

  • Climate change implies more frequent and more damaging disasters (Van Aalst 2006)
  • Disasters do not discriminate with respect to wealth, but institutions and wealth helps mitigate deaths (Kahn 2005)
  • Growing fiscal and social costs within the United States
    • More frequent FEMA disaster declarations
    • Higher federal costs for declared disasters
    • Non-disaster government transfers increases may understate true cost (Deryugina 2016)

Out of the Frying Pan?

  • Some evidence that people move after big disasters
    • Boustan et al. (2017)
    • Carleton and Hsiang (2016)
  • Rational actors respond to disasters by moving to new locations
    • Because their homes are destroyed?
    • Because the local economy is harmed?
    • Because they have updated their priors about risks?
  • Move people out of dangerous areas, but does this lower future disaster costs?
  • All else equal, higher exposure areas should see lower migration rates

And Into the Fire?

  • Disaster exposure is spatially correlated
  • Disasters are negative income shocks and long moves are costly
  • People tend to move relatively short distances
  • If disasters induce shorter moves, migration may not lower future disaster costs
  • Shorter moves may not lower costs
    • Key question: where do disaster migrants locate to?
    • And does migration mitigate impacts of disasters or simply rearrange the deck chairs?

Hurricane Katrina

Impacts

  • Category 3 Hurricane at landing (sustained winds of 100–140 miles per hour)
  • Landed 25 August 2005 in Louisiana
  • Total damage estimated at $108 billion (Knobb, Rhome, and Brown 2005)
  • Deaths appear to be at least 1,500 (Beven et al. 2008)
  • Triggered response of over $5.7 billion in FEMA disaster relief

How Did Katrina Affect New Orleans Migrants?

  • Data from IRS county-to-county migration used, tracks filed tax returns at FIPS code from year to year
  • Typical outmigration from New Orleans area from 2000 to 2010 excluding 2005 averaged 21,482 outmigrants per year (average population of 1,421,693)
    • Parishes - Jefferson, Lafourche, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. John the Baptist, and St. Tammany, and Terrebonne
    • Fairly stable spatial distribution - nearby and large metro regions
  • In 2005, total of 181,854 outmigrants
    • Similar spatial pattern exists plus evident overflow

Empirical Strategy

Gravity Model

Beginings from Newtonian physics, which imply

\[ F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2} \]

Princeton Astronomer James Q. Stewart observed the composition of students in his classroom (J. Q. Stewart 1941):

\[ M_{ij} = k \frac{P_{i}^{\beta_1} P_{j}^{\beta_2}}{D_{ij}^{\gamma}} \]

Modified

For outmigration from Katrina affected areas:

\[ m_{i,t} = \alpha + \gamma D_{i} + \beta_1 P_{i,t} + \beta_2 {Katrina} + \beta_3 \mathbf{X_{i,t}} + \varepsilon_{i,t}\]

  • \(i\) indicates county destination and \(t\) indicates year
  • \(m\) is migration measure
    • Raw flow, inverse hyperbolic sine, share of outflow, and indicator of positive migration
  • \(D\) indicates distance from centroid of affected area
  • \(P\) is the population for destination county
  • \({Katrina}\) is dummy variable for 2005
  • \(\mathbf{X_{i,t}}\) are economic characteristics: unemployment rate, median rent, average pay

Modified

Model entails destination's distance from New Orleans, its population, a Katrina indicator for 2005, and economic indicators.

  • Panel of migration outflow from affected counties from 2000 to 2010
  • Start with baseline model of New Orleans area destinations
  • Interact explanatory variables with Katrina variable
  • Attribute change in effects to the disaster response

Results

Baseline
Flow IHS LP Share
Distance -1.8062*** -0.0239*** -0.0048*** -0.005***
(hundreds of km) (0.4165) (0.0027) (5e-04) (0.0012)
Population 193.1327* 1.9915*** 0.3992*** 0.474**
(millions) (110.3825) (0.463) (0.1027) (0.2188)
Katrina 51.6205*** 0.4618*** 0.092*** -1e-04
(12.9152) (0.0222) (0.005) (0.0038)
Adjusted R-Squared 0.037 0.305 0.288 0.114

Baseline Economic Characteristics
Flow IHS LP Share
Unemployment Rate -12.6374 -1.4173*** -0.3361*** -0.1494**
(29.0974) (0.3073) (0.0689) (0.0688)
Average Annual Pay 0.7527* 0.0155*** 0.0036*** 0.002*
(in thousands) (0.4318) (0.0042) (9e-04) (0.001)
Median Monthly Rent -3.9009 0.0166 0.0057* -0.0071
(in hundreds) (3.7921) (0.0138) (0.0031) (0.0076)
Adjusted R-Squared 0.037 0.305 0.288 0.114

Katrina Interactions
Flow IHS LP Share
Distance -1.1153*** -0.0197*** -0.004*** -0.005***
(hundreds of km) (0.2699) (0.0026) (5e-04) (0.0012)
Interaction -7.2918*** -0.0528*** -0.0099*** 2e-04
(1.6765) (0.0035) (8e-04) (6e-04)
Population 101.5004** 1.9065*** 0.3929*** 0.4588**
(millions) (45.2713) (0.4314) (0.0989) (0.1978)
Interaction 1054.9499 0.7248** 0.0198 0.1771
(772.432) (0.3459) (0.0428) (0.2535)
Katrina 95.5467 -1.5462*** -0.3372*** -0.0042
(216.3368) (0.2037) (0.0366) (0.0861)
Adjusted R-Squared 0.112 0.336 0.309 0.115

Katrina Economic Interactions
Flow IHS LP Share
Unemployment Rate -55.4713*** -1.4865*** -0.3467*** -0.1844***
(15.697) (0.2911) (0.0678) (0.0704)
Interaction 1030.2041*** 9.2898*** 1.8593*** 0.7037***
(385.1283) (1.4963) (0.3017) (0.2396)
Average Annual Pay 0.4678** 0.0138*** 0.0033*** 0.002**
(in thousands) (0.2186) (0.004) (9e-04) (0.001)
Interaction 2.8474 0.028*** 0.0053*** 0
(3.5034) (0.0058) (0.0012) (0.0013)
Median Monthly Rent -1.4195 0.0023 0.0024 -0.0063
(in hundreds) (1.3117) (0.0132) (0.0031) (0.0068)
Interaction -29.4207 0.246*** 0.056*** -0.0091
(36.7561) (0.0275) (0.0059) (0.0132)
Adjusted R-Squared 0.112 0.336 0.309 0.115

Conclusion

A role for policy

  • Katrina's impact on outmigration increased the outflows in both volume and breadth, but the distribution of appears unaffected
  • Katrina disaster migrants do not migrate as far from New Orleans than in non-disaster years and destination population became less important
  • Economic variables indicate mixed results with respect to migration decision of Katrina migrants
  • Migration decisions do not appear to mitigate risk as measured via distance
  • Data limitations constrain the ability to determine the degree to which migrants return to New Orleans

Thank You

References

Beven, John L, Lixion A Avila, Eric S Blake, Daniel P Brown, James L Franklin, Richard D Knabb, Richard J Pasch, Jamie R Rhome, and Stacy R Stewart. 2008. “Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005.” Monthly Weather Review 136 (3): 1109–73.

Boustan, Leah Platt, Matthew E Kahn, Paul W Rhode, and Maria Lucia Yanguas. 2017. “The Effect of Natural Disasters on Economic Activity in Us Counties: A Century of Data.” National Bureau of Economic Research.

Carleton, Tamma A, and Solomon M Hsiang. 2016. “Social and Economic Impacts of Climate.” Science 353 (6304). American Association for the Advancement of Science: aad9837.

Deryugina, Tatyana. 2016. “The Fiscal Cost of Hurricanes: Disaster Aid Versus Social Insurance.” National Bureau of Economic Research.

Kahn, Matthew E. 2005. “The Death Toll from Natural Disasters: The Role of Income, Geography, and Institutions.” Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (2). MIT Press: 271–84.

Knobb, RD, JR Rhome, and RD Brown. 2005. “Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Katrina.” Technical Report, NOAA National Hurricane Center, 23–30 August.

Stewart, John Q. 1941. “An Inverse Distance Variation for Certain Social Influences.” Science 93 (2404). American Association for the Advancement of Science: 89–90.

Van Aalst, Maarten K. 2006. “The Impacts of Climate Change on the Risk of Natural Disasters.” Disasters 30 (1). Wiley Online Library: 5–18.